History of

Looking Back At Snooker History: World Championship Challenge Matches (1964-68)

The World Snooker Championship, and snooker tournaments in general, all follow a similar format. This format generally adheres to a bracketed structure in which players are expected to win a series of matches as they progress through an event, thereby eliminating the opponents they defeat from the competition. This can be otherwise known as a ‘knockout’ format. However, the World Championship wasn’t always this way, as we’ll now explore.

In fairness, for the most part since the WSC’s conception, the tournament has involved the knockout format. Although, between the years 1964-68, it followed a different structure. Due to struggling interest in the sport between the years 1958-63, there were no WSC’s held. In fact, very few (if any) official tournaments were actually held during these years. Cuetracker shows that no tournaments were sanctioned from 1959-63.

That is until Rex Williams intervened. Williams was able to schmooze the BA&CC chairman and convince him over lunch to revive the WSC. One can only speculate as to the choice of format used for these events but the following events would be held under a challenge basis; whereby the defending champion would play against a challenger. And this would be the only match of the championship.

This may have been chosen due to the declining interest, so by playing fewer matches which all involved the defending champion would perhaps spark and retain a little more interest in the sport. Whether this was a successful method or not, one thing is for certain: who knows how long it would have been before the WSC returned, if at all.

Now that the World Championship had returned, enter John Pulman. Pulman was the winner of the previously held WSC in 1957, which made him the defending champion for the challenge-based WSC to follow. This is where Pulman established his dominance as he was able to successfully defend the championship in all of his encounters from 1964-68. This involved multiple victories over Fred Davis, Williams (as above) and later on, Eddie Charlton in the final iteration of the challenge-based WSC.

The interesting thing that struck me with these tournaments is that they weren’t held annually. Kind of. Again, the reasons are unknown but I feel the WSC’s/challenge matches were only held when it was available to do so. This meant that there were two WSC’s in 1964, three in 1965 and none at all in 1967. This technically meant that Pulman won two world championships in 1964 and three in 1965. However, there are always going to be asterisks next to these stating how these were contested over challenge matches. Although, when Pulman won every single match, was it really a challenge?

Other fun facts about these series of challenge matches were that a couple of them were held in South Africa as part of a tour. Also, Williams was able to break the previous WSC record break of 136 as he made a 142 against Pulman in November 1965. This record stood for 16 years until it was finally beaten by Doug Mountjoy in 1981.

Nevertheless, the WSC format did eventually revert back to its original knockout format in 1969. This, of course, was the time many considered the start of the modern era as it then propelled snooker into stardom thanks to the likes of Pot Black and personalities of those such as Ray Reardon and Alex Higgins. It’s hard to tell whether this would have still occurred without the existence of the 1964-68 challenge matches, but they certainly have their place in snooker history and I’m glad that Williams’ intervention aided in reducing the gap between WSC’s during a difficult time period.


93.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: Looking Back At Snooker History: Tobacco Sponsorships

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

Looking Back At Snooker History: Tobacco Sponsorships

93.jpg

Spanning decades, snooker was backed and sponsored by members of the tobacco industry. It was reported that up to 70% of revenue generated derived from these sources, which in turn produced tournaments such as the ‘Benson & Hedges Masters’ and ‘Embassy World Championship’ (which lasted for 30 years). For the past 15 years, there has been a shift in the nature of advertising involved in snooker, but are things really that different?

In the 1970s, as Pot Black was rising in popularity (link to Pot Black Short below), prospective sponsors wanted to become more involved with the sport which showcased personas such as Ray Reardon and Alex Higgins. As snooker gained exposure and more importantly, TV coverage, this led to the revolution of tobacco sponsorships being attached to many of the tournaments throughout the season, such as the Welsh/Scottish Open and Irish Masters.

The next 30 years saw a pattern of tobacco sponsorships similar to what we are used to seeing currently with betting companies. You could say that tobacco sponsorships were one of the characteristics of the Golden era of snooker; along with players’ smoking/eating/drinking, shining personalities and large-scale appeal.

However, during the mid-1990s UK legislation forbade tobacco products from being advertised on television. This was then escalated in 1999 when shops and newsagents were also disallowed from advertising these products. It was also known at this time that any kind of tobacco sponsorship among sporting events would cease by 2003. This would affect other sports such as rugby, darts and F1.

Considering how heavily reliant snooker was on the revenue from tobacco sponsorships, the WPBSA appealed to ministers to grant a 3-year extension/buffer period. This was approved on the basis of snooker being a world event and its considerable dependence on this revenue source. Formula 1 was the only other sport that was allowed this extension period. We’re dealing in the millions of £s here and since this was a substantial portion of World Snooker funds, would result in a critical gap in the budget.

Despite WPBSA and World Snooker having extra time to try and arrange their future sponsorship arrangements, the effects of this cut were still felt across the landscape. The WSC prize fund fell from £1.1m in 2005 to just under £900k in 2006; with the winners share dropping by £50,000. They were able to obtain sponsorship for the 2006 WSC from a betting company, although there were a lot of problems arising with some players and their own personal sponsors, who were rivals of this betting company, therefore resulting in a loss of income.

The rest of the decade was a struggle for snooker as there weren’t many ranking events or tournaments to compete in. Some events had to be completely cut due to the lack of available funding and many considered snooker a dying sport. It was held by the sponsorships of betting companies and various retail outlets.

Following the end of tobacco sponsorships most events, namely the Triple Crowns and other UK-based tournaments, were funded by numerous betting companies. This is still prevalent to current day however, given the nature of this industry, it wouldn’t be surprising if government legislation causes it to suffer a similar fate to its predecessor. And if it does, I hope the WST has something planned and isn’t too overly reliant on this source of income.

I’m certain this isn’t the case as WST would have learned from the experience with tobacco sponsorships. And it mainly seems like something that is evident in the UK and some European tournaments. Most tournaments taking place in China seem to have sponsors that lean away from these industries i.e. financial institutions. Although, even though long-term deals are generally agreed with these companies I do hope that WST aim to attain sponsors that are more in line with the class that is carried with the sport.


86.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: History of Pot Black

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

History of Pot Black

86.jpg

Some may remember, but I reckon there’s a significant portion of viewers who are only vaguely aware of Pot Black and the important role it played in getting snooker on the map in the late 60s/early 70s. Let’s roll back the years and learn a little more about the phenomenon that catapulted the sport of snooker to great heights and paved the way for the game as we know it today.

In 1967, BBC began colour-broadcasts and were still looking for programming that would benefit from this new use of colour. Fast forward to 1969 and the first iteration of Pot Black (commissioned by Sir David Attenborough), snooker had gone from a minor sport to an experience that resonated with many fans and viewers. And what would better benefit from the use of colour technology than a sport where commentary formerly involved describing to listeners how each ball was a differing shade of grey.

Speaking of commentary, Pot Black was cast by the one and only Ted Lowe. BBC producer Phil Lewis contacted Lowe and asked him to gather players and arrange the series for broadcast. Lewis was certain at the time of the name ‘Pot Black’ which Lowe was hesitant about due to the lack of ‘snooker’, but continued with the necessary preparations so he can finally get the game on television.

Along with its conception was the approach to snooker decorum where players wore the traditional, smart clothing that we are used to seeing today; emulating that of Joe Davis, who was a long-time hero of Lowes.

Prior to the light bulb moment that was Pot Black, snooker was just a niche activity that didn’t really have a place yet. It was mainly an activity indulged by gentries/nobles or those in run-down billiard halls. Lowe stated that the programme helped bring the game into the homes of millions of viewers in between those two classes. And that’s exactly what it did. Snooker was put on the map.

The format of the tournament generally followed a one-frame shootout style, including the final. Depending on the year, between 6 and 16 players were involved and the show was broadcast on a weekly half-an-hour basis, broadcasting one match per episode. It was much like an episode of your favourite drama or late night chat show that you would tune into every week; along with the drama and comedy that came with the players involved in Pot Black. The whole tournament was often filmed in the course of a day.

It was risky for the players involved in the tournament as Pot Black was the main form of snooker that was shown on television. Ray Reardon, who happened to win the first Pot Black, shared some of these concerns as reputations were determined by a one-frame shootout; stating those who lost often struggled to even find exhibition work afterwards.

Despite its tremendous success, Pot Black only ran until 1986 (with a few revivals in the 90s and 00s) where mainstream professional snooker took its place in TV coverage. Without Pot Black, the whole landscape of snooker may be completely different. Who knows if many of the success stories we’ve seen in snooker would have still happened if it weren’t for Pot Black? It may be a time that most will have very few memories of (or none at all), but it’s certainly something that will never be forgotten in snooker as time goes on.

Fun fact: Ronnie O’Sullivan and Stephen Hendry have never won Pot Black (not including Junior Pot Black). Steve Davis has won four times (82, 83, 91, and 93).


59.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: History of the UK Championship

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

History of the UK Championship

59.jpg

As one of the Triple Crown events, the UK Championship is the first of the majors that take place in the snooker calendar. With an enormous Masters-level £200,000 available to the winner this year, let’s find out about one of snookers oldest tournaments.

The UK Championship was established in 1977 and held in Blackpool for its initial staging. It was later held in Preston up until 1997 where the tournament was then transferred to Bournemouth for a few years before naming its home at the Barbican Centre in York since 2001 (Side note: Telford held the UK Championship for a few years from 2007-10).

The inaugural tournament was won by Patsy Fagan with a victory over Doug Mountjoy and the historic championship has been won by all the big names you could probably think of. Literally, if you can think of them, they have probably won it. Notable UK finals include 1983 (A. Higgins and Davis), 1993 (O’Sullivan becomes youngest winner), 2011 (Trump) and 2018 (O’Sullivan overtakes Davis and Hendry).

Funnily enough, the UKC wasn’t always a ranking event. The first seven iterations, up until 1983 were non-ranking and only British residents were allowed to enter. It was in 1984 when the UKC became classed as a ranking event which all players were allowed to enter. It then became the second highest ranking event before the International and China Championships were introduced.

Also, this major was formerly contested over a longer duration. We’re used to seeing the finals of the UKC fought in a best-of-19 (first to 10) matchup. However, in the 1980s and early 90s, the finals would be played over a best-of-31 (first to 16).

Interestingly, all UK titles since 2012 have been won by either Robertson, Selby or O’Sullivan. Although, with the way things are going (this is written in August just after Trump’s International Championship win) this sentence may have to be amended to ‘all UK titles since 2011 have been won by either Trump, Robertson, Selby or O’Sullivan’.